人民卫生出版社系列期刊
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
2020《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2): 91-96.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

CD4/CD8比值在HIV感染者中临床分析及其预测价值

王思苑1, 孙丽琴1, 段司沁2, 宋莹1, 饶嫚1, 周泱1   

  1. 1.南方科技大学附属第二医院/深圳市第三人民医院感染科,广东 深圳 518112;
    2.南方医科大学药学院,广州,510515
  • 出版日期:2019-06-30 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 周泱, Email:516472422@qq.com

The role of CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting clinical outcomes in human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) infected patients

WANG Si-yuan1, SUN Li-qing1, DUAN Si-qin2, SONG Ying1, RAO Man1, ZHOU Yang1   

  1. 1.Division of Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518112, China;
    2.School of Pharmaceutical Sciences,Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Online:2019-06-30 Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 目的 在抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)前HIV感染者中,分析不同的CD4/CD8比值与临床特征相互关系,探讨其预测临床意义的价值。方法 回顾性收集1982年1月至2018年10月由深圳市第三人民医院长期门诊随访艾滋病患者11 357人,因资料不全剔除835人,实际纳入研究对象10 522人。按不同CD4/CD8比值分成3组,即CD4/CD8比值<0.2(3535人),0.2≤CD4/CD8比值<0.4(4410人),CD4/CD8比值≥0.4(2577人)。回顾性分析不同研究组基本人口学资料、临床特征、CD4+T淋巴细胞、CD8+T淋巴细胞及HIV病毒载量。结果 在10522个研究对象中,平均年龄(33.64±10.34)岁,CD4+T淋巴细胞绝对值为(246.96±160.26)个/μl,CD8+T淋巴细胞绝对值为(898.69±523.28)个/μl,CD4/CD8比值为0.30±0.24。在三个CD4/CD8比值研究组中,通过多元线性回归分析发现,CD4/CD8比值水平与性别(t值4.135,95%CI:0.017~0.046)、机会感染(t值-21.609,95%CI:-0.103~-0.086)、WHO临床分期(t值-38.782,95%CI:-0.092~-0.083)、确诊HIV后延迟ART时间(t值 -2.904,95%CI:-0.022~-0.004)、HIVRNA载量(t值 -16.385,95%CI:-0.047~-0.037)有密切相关性,具有统计学差异,P均<0.01;而与年龄(t值-1.006,95%CI:-0.001~0.000)、体重指数(t值-1.161,95%CI:-0.002~0.001)、死亡人数(t值0.058,95%CI:-0.044~0.047)无明显相关性,P均>0.05。结论 ART前HIV感染者CD4/CD8比值水平越低,提示HIV感染者合并机会感染可能性越大、确认HIV后延迟ART时间越长、WHO临床分期越晚、HIVRNA载量越高。但是,CD4/CD8比值水平与ART前HIV感染者年龄、死亡结局无明显相关性。这提示CD4/CD8比值可能作为HIV感染者合并机会感染临床情况评估,具有一定预测价值。

关键词: 人类免疫缺陷病毒, CD4/CD8比值, 临床分析, 预测价值

Abstract: Objcetive To investigate the role of CD4/CD8 ratio in predicting clinical outcomes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus(HIV) infected Patients with newly antiretroviral treatment(ART).Method Total of 11357 HIV infected patients with newly ART admitted during January 1982 to October 2018 in Shenzhen the Third People's Hospital were analyzed, retrospectively. 10,522 subjects were included in the study due to exclusion of subjects with incomplete information. The clinical characteristics and levels of CD4/CD8 ratio were collected. According to the tertiles of CD4/CD8 ratio [0-0.20, 0.20-0.40 (reference), >0.40], the patients were divided into three groups: CD4/CD8 ratio <0.2 group (3535 cases) , 0.2≤CD4/CD8 ratio <0.4 group (4410 cases)and CD4/CD8 rati≥0.4 group (2577 cases).Result s Of the 10522 subjects, mean age ± Standard Deviation(SD) was (33.64 ± 10.34) years ,mean CD4+T-cells ± SD was (246.96±160.26)cells/mm3,mean CD8+T-cells ± SD was (898.69 ± 523.28) cells/mm3 and mean CD4/CD8 ratio ± SD was (0.30 ± 0.24). Based on multivariate linear regression analysis, factors associated with the CD4/CD8 ratio were gender,(t-tests 4.135, 95% CI: 0.017~0.046, P<0.001),opportunistic infections(t-tests -21.609, 95% CI: -0.103~-0.086, P<0.001), clinical stages of HIV infection with the WHO classification(t-tests -38.782, 95% CI: -0.092~-0.083, P<0.001),time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation(t-tests -2.904, 95% CI: -0.022~-0.004, P<0.001) and HIVRNA loads(t-tests -16.385, 95% CI:-0.047~-0.037, P<0.001). The CD4/CD8 ratio in multivariate analysis was not associated with age (t-tests -1.006, 95% CI: -0.001~-0.000, >0.05), body mass index (t-tests -1.161, 95%CI: -0.002~-0.001, >0.05), and deaths (t-value 0.058, 95% CI: -0.044-0.047, >0.05).Conclusions In this large cohort collaboration, the lower CD4/CD8 ratio in HIV-infected patients with newly ART was associatde with the longer time between HIV diagnosis and ART initiation ,the later clinical stages of HIV infection with the WHO classification and the higher HIVRNA loads,which indicated that more opportunistic infections. This large study showed the use of CD4/CD8 ratio can be used as a prognostic marker for clinical progression of opportunistic infections.

Key words: Human Immunodeficiency Virus, CD4/CD8 ratio, Predictive value, Clinical outcomes