对比分析蜱传人和人传人致发热伴血小板减少综合征的临床特征及预后

doi:10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2022.01.006

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1): 26-29.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2022.01.006

对比分析蜱传人和人传人致发热伴血小板减少综合征的临床特征及预后

张爱平, 梁曼曼, 王子健, 王文节, 杨江华

皖南医学院弋矶山医院感染性疾病科,安徽芜湖 241001

收稿日期:2021-07-29 出版日期:2022-02-28 发布日期:2022-07-07
通讯作者: 杨江华,Email:yjhpath@163.com;王文节,Email:994806539@qq.com

Comparison of clinical features and prognosis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome transmitted from tick-to-person versus person-to-person

Zhang Aiping, Liang Manman, Wang Zijian, Wang Wenjie, Yang Jianghua

Department of Infectious Diseases, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Anhui Wuhu 241001, China

Received:2021-07-29 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过对不同途径感染新型布尼亚病毒致发热伴血小板减少综合征（SFTS）的临床特征及预后影响指标分析,为该病的预防控制和判断预后提供参考依据。方法回顾性分析皖南医学院弋矶山医院2015年1月至2020年6月确诊的新型布尼亚病毒感染致发热伴血小板减少综合征的病例资料,根据有传播途径不同,分为蜱传人感染组（37例）和人传人感染组（12例）,比较两组流行病学资料、临床症状、实验室检测指标及预后等差异。结果 SFTS发病集中于4–6月,人传人感染组感染途径是接触确诊患者的血液/体液;蜱传人感染组是由于户外活动被蜱虫叮咬感染。人传人感染组从发病到就诊时间中位数为2.5d,蜱传人感染组从发病到就诊时间中位数为5.0d,两组差异具有统计学意义。蜱传人感染组意识障碍比例43.2%（16/37）,明显高于人传人感染组0(0/12)。人传人感染组危重症人数为16.7%（2/12）,明显低于蜱传人感染组91.9%（34/37）;蜱传人感染组死亡人数为29.7%（11/37）,而人传人感染组无一例死亡。结论 SFTS由蜱虫叮咬感染的患者病情更重,预后不良风险更高,应针对蜱虫感染患者制定科学的防控策略和治疗方案。

关键词: 发热伴血小板减少综合征, 蜱传人, 人传人, 新型布尼亚病毒, 预后

Abstract: Objective By analyzing the clinical features and prognostic indicators of novel phlebovirus infection in different ways induced severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome(SFTS), it provides a reference for the prevention and control of the disease and early prognosis. Method Retrospective analysis of the confirmed cases of SFTS from January 2015 to June 2020 in Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, according to the different transmission routes, they were divided into tick-to-persontransmission infection group (37 cases) and person-to-person transmission infection group (12 cases). The epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, blood biochemical examination and prognosis were analyzed retrospectively. Result The incidence of SFTS mainly occurred in April to June, and the infection route of the person-to-person transmission infection group was contact with the blood/body fluids of the confirmed patients. The tick-to-person transmission infection group was infected by tick bites during outdoor activities.The median time from onset to treatment was 2.5 days in person-to-person transmission infection group and 5.0 days in tick-to-person transmission infection group,the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The proportion of consciousness disorder in tick-to-person transmission infection group was 43.24% (16/37) higher than that in person-to-person transmission infection group.The number of critical patients in person-to-person transmission group was 16.67%(2/12), which was significantly lower than 91.89% (34/37) in tick-to-person transmission infection group. The number of deaths in ticks-to-person transmission infection group was 29.73% (11/37), but none in person-to-person transmission infection group. Conclusion The tick-to-person transmission infection group is more serious and the risk of poor prognosis is higher, so we should scientifically formulate prevention and control strategies and treatment plans for ticks infection patients.

Key words: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Tick- to-human transmission, Person-to-person transmission, New bunyavirus, Prognosis

张爱平, 梁曼曼, 王子健, 王文节, 杨江华. 对比分析蜱传人和人传人致发热伴血小板减少综合征的临床特征及预后[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2022, 7(1): 26-29.

Zhang Aiping, Liang Manman, Wang Zijian, Wang Wenjie, Yang Jianghua. Comparison of clinical features and prognosis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome transmitted from tick-to-person versus person-to-person[J]. Electronic Journal of Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2022, 7(1): 26-29.

参考文献

[1] YU XJ, LIANG MF, ZHANG SY, et al.Fever with Thrombocytopenia Associated with a Novel Bunyavirus in China[J]. N Eng J Med, 2011, 364(16): 1523-1532.
[2] ZHAN J, WANG Q, CHENG J, et al.Current status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China[J]. Virol Sin, 2017, 32(1):51-62.
[3] LIU K, ZHOU H, SUN RX, et al.A national assessment of the epidemiology of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome,China[J]. Sci Rep, 2015, 5:9679.
[4] GONG L, SONG DD, WU JB, et al.Human-to-human transmissions of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in Anhui province, 2010-2017[J]. Clin Micro Infect, 2018,24(8) : 920-922.
[5] SUN Y, LIANG M, QU J, et al.Early diagnosis of novel SFTS bunya- virus infection by quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay[J]. J Clin Virol, 2012, 53(1):48-53.
[6] CUI F, CAO HX, WANG L, et al.Clinical and epidemiological study on severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in Yiyuan Coun- ty,Shandong Province,China[J]. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2013, 88( 3):510-512.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部. 发热伴血小板减少综合征防治指南(2010版)[J]. 中华临床感染病杂志, 2011, 4(4):193-194.
[8] 赵海燕, 孙静, 严晓敏, 等. 发热伴血小板减少综合征患者的临床特点及死亡相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2016, 34(1):15-18.
[9] 戴新宪, 郝春生, 陈蕾, 等. 发热伴血小板减少综合征布尼亚病毒灭活疫苗生产用变异株的筛选及鉴定[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2016, 25(23):2670-2675.
[10] 王彦丽, 刘沛. 发热伴血小板减少综合征人人间传播患者临床特征分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2017, 20(6):745-747.
[11] 马涛, 徐庆, 李晨, 等. 2010 -2016年南京市发热伴血小板减少综合征流行特征分析[J]. 现代预防医学, 2017, 44(16):2890-2894.
[12] 李文. 发热伴血小板减少综合征流行病学特点与临床特征分析[J]. 中国病原生物学杂志, 2017, 12(9):901-904.
[13] 王巧玲, 李潇丹, 孙林林, 等. 291例发热伴血小板减少综合征患者生存分析[J]. 国际流行病学传染病学杂志, 2018, 45(1):18-21.
[14] ZHAN JB, WANG Q, CHENG J, et al.Current status of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome in China[J]. Viro Sin, 2017, 32(1):51-62.
[15] 韩亚萍, 董莉, 孔练花, 等. 病毒载量和细胞因子在发热伴血小板减少综合征致病机制中的作用[J]. 中华传染病杂志, 2014, 32(9):538-544.
[16] 肖玲燕, 史东阳, 刘永福, 等. 重症新型布尼亚病毒感染的临床特征和疗效分析[J/CD]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2020, 5(1):16-19.
[17] 杨旻, 叶珺, 李惠, 等. 69例发热伴血小板减少综合征临床特点及预后影响因素的调查研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(4):402-405.
[18] 马婷, 孙继民, 龚震宇, 等. 2014年浙江省发热伴血小板减少综合征流行特征分析[J]. 中国人兽共患病学报, 2015, 22(11):1023-1026.

对比分析蜱传人和人传人致发热伴血小板减少综合征的临床特征及预后

Comparison of clinical features and prognosis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome transmitted from tick-to-person versus person-to-person

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋敏, 谢智恩, 杨宏志, 吴华强, 官权, 钟鹏, 方伟军. 基于术前CT图像的放射组学模型预测脊柱结核手术治疗预后的研究[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2022, 7(2): 52-56.
[2]	李莎, 卢亦波, 谢周华. 广西地区恙虫病77例临床特征分析[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2020, 5(3): 173-177.
[3]	杨林, 吴诗品. 先天性人巨细胞病毒感染的防治进展[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2020, 5(2): 131-135.
[4]	肖玲燕, 史东阳, 刘永福, 郑以山. 重症新型布尼亚病毒感染的临床特征和疗效分析[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2020, 5(1): 16-19.
[5]	陈力, 刘敏, 何小庆, 吴玉珊, 李奇穗, 陈耀凯. 29例艾滋病相关淋巴瘤临床特点及预后因素分析[J]. 新发传染病电子杂志, 2018, 3(3): 153-155.