人民卫生出版社系列期刊
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
2020《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4): 29-33.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2024.04.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

声触诊弹性成像在非酒精性脂肪性肝病合并慢性乙型肝炎诊断中的应用价值

李晓慧1, 曾伟梅1, 董常峰1, 郑保奇1, 陈昕2, 刘忠2   

  1. 1.深圳市第三人民医院超声科,广东 深圳 518112;
    2.深圳大学生物医学工程学院,广东 深圳 518000
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-02 出版日期:2024-08-31 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 郑保奇,Email: 415625448@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金重大科研仪器研制项目(82327804); 深圳市第三人民医院院内项目(G2022018)

Application value of sound touch elastography in diagnosing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease complicated with chronic hepatitis B

Li Xiaohui1, Zeng Weimei1, Dong Changfeng1, Zheng Baoqi1, Chen Xin2, Liu Zhong2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518112, China;
    2. School of Biomedical Engineering, Shenzhen University, Guangdong Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2024-02-02 Online:2024-08-31 Published:2024-10-10

摘要: 目的 探讨声触诊弹性成像(sound touch elastography,STE)诊断非酒精性脂肪性肝病(non-alcoholic fatty liver disease,NAFLD)合并慢性乙型肝炎(chronic hepatitis B,CHB)的价值,明确STE分期诊断NAFLD合并CHB患者肝纤维化程度的效能。方法 选取2018年1月至2023年1月在深圳市第三人民医院肝病科就诊的NAFLD患者74例和NAFLD合并CHB患者142例,分别纳入NAFLD组、NAFLD合并CHB组。选取健康志愿者61例,纳入对照组。NAFLD合并CHB组患者根据METAVIR肝纤维化分级标准分为S1期、S2期、S3期、S4期。所有受试者均接受肝STE、肝声触诊定量(sound touch quantify,STQ)检查,比较三组间肝弹性测值有无差异,绘制受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operator characteristic curve,ROC曲线)。结果 三组间肝硬度值(liver stiffness measurement,LSM)、肝STE、肝STQ有统计学差异(P<0.001)。肝STE、肝STQ区分对照组与NAFLD合并CHB组的ROC曲线下面积(under the curve,AUC)为0.834、0.805;区分对照组与NAFLD组的AUC为0.628、0.617;区分NAFLD合并CHB组与NAFLD组的AUC为0.741、0.715。肝STE诊断NAFLD合并CHB组≥S1、≥S2、≥S3期肝纤维化和S4期肝硬化的AUC分别为0.834、0.889、0.940、0.950。结论 NAFLD合并CHB时,肝脏STE、STQ值较NAFLD患者及正常人群升高。肝STE在分期诊断NAFLD合并CHB患者肝纤维化程度方面具备显著价值。

关键词: 非酒精性脂肪性肝病, 慢性乙型肝炎, 声触诊弹性成像, 声触诊定量

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of sound touch elastography(STE) in diagnosing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) complicated with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and identifying the Diagnostic efficacy of STE for staging the degree of liver fibrosis in this combination. Method A total of 74 NAFLD patients and 142 NAFLD patients complicated with CHB who were selected from January 2018 to January 2023 were included in the NAFLD group and NAFLD complicated with CHB group, respectively. NAFLD complicated with CHB group were classified as stage S1, stage S2, stage S3, and stage S4 according to the METAVIR grading criteria. 61 healthy volunteers were selected and included in the control group. All subjects accepted liver STE and liver STQ examinations. Compare the three groups and draw the receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC). Result There was significant difference in liver STE and liver STQ among the three groups (P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) of liver STE and liver STQ between control group and NAFLD complicated with CHB group was 0.834 and 0.805, the AUC between control group and NAFLD group was 0.628 and 0.617, and the AUC between NAFLD complicated with CHB group and NAFLD group was 0.741 and 0.715. The AUC of liver STE in diagnosing NAFLD complicated with CHB ≥S1, ≥S2, ≥S3 liver fibrosis and S4 cirrhosis were 0.834, 0.889, 0.940, 0.950 respectively. Conclusion There were differences in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) among NAFLD complicated with CHB, NAFLD and normal liver. Liver STE can distinguish NAFLD complicated with CHB Group from control group and NAFLD group, it has great value in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients suffered NAFLD complicated with CHB.

Key words: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Chronic hepatitis B, Sound touch elastography, Sound touch quantify

中图分类号: