人民卫生出版社系列期刊
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
2020《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 35-37.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

抗菌药物不同应用方式对心肌梗死患者介入治疗后感染的预防效果比较

盛艳华, 吴佳逢, 陈培芬, 吴强   

  1. 深圳市第三人民医院内科,广东 深圳 518000
  • 出版日期:2020-01-20 发布日期:2020-04-22
  • 通讯作者: 陈培芬,Email:drcpf@sohu.com
  • 基金资助:
    1.2014年广东省医学科研基金项目(A2014639); 2.2014年深圳市医学科研基金项目(CXZZ20140411112047886)

Comparison of the preventive effect of different antibiotics on infections in patients with myocardial infarction after interventional therapy

Sheng Yanhua, Wu Jiafeng, Chen Peifen, Wu Qiang   

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen,Guangdong Shenzhen 518000,China
  • Online:2020-01-20 Published:2020-04-22

摘要: 目的 探讨抗菌药物不同应用方式在心肌梗死患者介入治疗后感染中的预防效果。方法 以深圳市第三人民医院2010年12月至2018年12月接受介入治疗的200例急性心肌梗死患者作为研究对象,根据抗菌药物的应用方法分为A组、B组、C组和D组。A组(50例)术前和术后均使用抗菌药物;B组(50例)术前使用抗菌药物,术后不使用抗菌药物;C组(50例)术前不使用抗菌药物,术后使用抗菌药物;D组(50例)术前和术后均未使用抗菌药物,比较四组介入治疗后感染发生率,记录住院时间。结果 A组、B组、C组和D组介入治疗后感染发生率为4%、6%、6%和18%,A组、B组和C组感染发生率组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组、B组、C组感染发生率均明显低于D组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组、B组、C组和D组的住院时间分别为(8.7±1.2)d、(8.5±1.4)d、(8.4±1.1)d和(14.3±1.2)d,A组、B组、C组的平均住院时间均明显短于D组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 介入手术前后使用抗菌药物可有效预防急性心肌梗死术后感染,临床上应合理应用。

关键词: 抗菌药物, 心肌梗死, 介入治疗, 术后感染, 预防效果

Abstract: Objective To explore the preventive effect of different application methods of antibiotics on infection after interventional therapy in patients with myocardial infarction after interventional therapy. Methods 200 patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent interventional therapy in our hospital were divided into group A, group B, group C and group D according to the application method of antibiotics. Group A (50 cases) used antibiotics preoperatively and postoperatively, group B (50 cases) used antibiotics before operation, group C (50 cases) did not use antibiotics before operation and antibiotics were used after operation, and group D (50 cases) did not use antibiotics before and after interventional therapy. The incidence of infection after interventional therapy was compared among the four groups, and hospital stay were recorded. Results The incidence of infection was 4%, 6%, 6% and 18% in group A, group B, group C and group D after interventional therapy. There was no significant difference in the incidence of infection between group A, group B, and group C. The incidence of infection in group A, group B and group C was significantly lower than that in group D (P<0.05). The average hospitalization time of group A, group B, group C and group D was (8.7+1.2) d, (8.5+1.4) d, (8.4+1.1) D and (14.3+1.2) D. The average hospital length of stay of group A, group B and group C was significantly shorter than that of group D. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The use of antibiotics before and after interventional surgery can effectively prevent post-operative infection of acute myocardial infarction, and should be reasonably applied in clinic.

Key words: Myocardial infarction, Interventional therapy, Postoperative infection, Preventive effect