People's Health Press
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R
  • Official WeChat

  • Official Weibo

  • Official headlines

Electronic Journal of Emerging Infectious Diseases ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 57-60.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2022.04.013

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Dual-center clinical evaluation of sputum smear automatic microscopy system for detecting tuberculosis

Zhao Doudou1, He Huishan2, Xia Li3, Zheng Qiuting4, Qian Lingjun3, Hong Kunlei3, Lure Fleming Yuan-ming3, Tao Lili4, Guo Lin3   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, the Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Xinjiang Urumqi, 830013, China;
    2. Department of Pathogenic Laboratory, Shenzhen Chronic Disease Control Center Shenzhen, Guangdong Shenzhen 518020, China;
    3. Shenzhen Zhiying Medical Imaging Co., Ltd, Guangdong Shenzhen 518109, China;
    4. Department of Medical Imaging, Shenzhen Chronic Disease Control Center Shenzhen, Guangdong Shenzhen 518020, China;
    5. Department of Pathology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518036, China
  • Received:2021-08-30 Published:2023-02-20

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the mycobacterium tuberculosis detection performance of ASSMS and compare it with that of the traditional manual way. Method 474 and 451 sputum specimens were retrospectively collected from Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Center Ⅰ) and Shenzhen Chronic Disease Control Center Shenzhen (Center Ⅱ), respectively, and mycobacterium tuberculosis tests were separately conducted by doctors and ASSMS after specimens were made into sputum smears. Results were finally compared and analyzed. Result The detection rate of ASSMS was higher than manual detection on two datasets of 925 cases (Center Ⅰ: P<0.05,Center Ⅱ: P>0.05). The results of center Ⅰshowed that the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of manual and automatic detection were 91.8% vs 90.5%, 74.4% vs 86.7% and 97.7% vs 91.8%, and the ASSMS finally identified 31 sputum samples (25.8%)that was missed by doctors. While the results from center Ⅱ showed that the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of manual and automatic detection were 90.7% vs 85.8%, 52.3% vs 68.2% and 94.8% vs 87.7%, and the ASSMS identified 21 sputum samples (47.7%) doctors missed. Conclusion Automatic detection may be functioned as an effective assistant to help doctors reduce missed diagnosis rate of tuberculosis.

Key words: Tuberculosis, Sputum smear, Automated microscopy, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Comparative study